103 items, ordered by date. Displaying page 1 of 3. Show on timeline Items per page: 25 | 50 | 100 | All
1. Handwritten notes entitled: Issues raised at PW [Price Waterhouse] debate, undated
Covers two-tier boards, audit committees, independence of non-executive directors.
2. Handwritten notes, headed Alan Sykes, Consolidated Goldfields, no date.
Covers non-executive directors and external auditing.
The paper briefly reviews issues in corporate governance: appointment of non-executive directors to the board and their contribution; the integrity of financial information; auditing standards and the responsibilities of auditors.
4. Letters from Marie Jennings, May and September 1991
Letters expressing interest in Committee and comment on independent non-executive directors.
5. Letter, dated 9 May 1991, from Martin Simons
Letter, 9 May 1991, from Martin Simons about timely payment of bills. Accompanying photocopy of letter, published in The Times.
6. Letters, June 1991, between Sir Adrian Cadbury and Neville Bain, Coats Viyella.
Neville Bain sets out some points on directors and responsibilities, annual reports and audit committees.
Objective of the meeting: to canvass Sir Ron's view of the ground the Committee might cover.
8. Letter, dated 8 July 1991, from Ian Hay Davison.
Letter in response to Sir Adrian Cadbury's letter of 2 July. IHD will send transcript of talk to ICAS on non-executive directors.
9. Correspondence with and papers from CBI, 10 July 1991, including minutes of meeting
Includes the CBI response to the ABI discussion paper on the responsibilities of institutional shareholders and minutes of meeting held on 25 June 1991.
Bow Group paper contains recommendations on non-executive directors, remuneration committees, audit committees, separation of roles, training for directors and their contracts, reporting auditing and memo from Sir Adrian Cadbury.
Expresses concern about tone and prescriptiveness of the report with regard to non-executive directors.
Includes correspondence from an institutional investor and articles of association of Guinness.
Sets out what ASB would be happy for the Cadbury Committee to consider.
Refers to the Blue Arrow affair and role of non-executive directors.
The letter is a response to a request to give evidence. Areas for discussion: responsibilities of shareholders, independence of auditors, influence of analysts, information to be given in reports.The letter has a siginifcant number of handwritten comments in Sir Adrian's hand.
16. Letter, dated 31 July 1991, from CB Gough, Coopers & Lybrand Deloitte
A contribution to the key issues for the Committee: roles of non-executive directors and shareholders; internal control systems; auditing appointments.
17. Letter, dated 5 August 1991, from Alan Diamond
Comments on non-executive directors.
Letter accompanies draft guidelines and survey of remuneration committees will follow in hard copy.
19. Fax letter from Mrs SE Brown, DTI, 30 August 1991.
Fax contains comments on a proposed structure for the final output and short comments on papers for the next meeting
20. Correspondence with Noel Falconer, September 1991
Concentrates on the role of non-executive directors.
21. Correspondence, September 1991, on access to legal and professional advisers and reimbursement
Sir Adrian sought advice from ICI, Sir Denys Henderson, and Sir David Plastow, Vickers, about non-executive directors' access to professional services and reimbursement for costs. Also a note by Nigel Peace.
Letter gives personal views of MG Lickiss on independence of non-executive directors and their responsibilities for discussing the process of the audit with external auditors, separation of the role of Chief Executive and Chairman, internal system controls applying to quoted companies.
Includes handwritten notes by Sir Adrian Cadbury and a summary of CRAs' corporate governance colloquium, 4 Dec 1991.
Comments on remuneration, directors' responsibilities and non-executive directors access to independent advice. Includes extract from a biographical sources and Sir Adrian's handwritten notes.
Gives the Labour position at the time.
Record focuses on role of accounting standards and auditors.
27. Letter, dated 1 October 1991, from Simon Blunt about service contracts for directors.
Letter expresses concerns about contracts granted to directors.
28. Letter from Andrew H Simon, Evode Group plc, 3 October 1991
Letter concentrates on various committees within a company and a responsible attitude being adopted by institutional shareholders.
Submisson concentrates on communication between companies and their shareholders, reporting on intangible assets and non-executive directors.
30. Letter, dated 16 October 1991, from Sir David Lees, GKN plc
Letter comments on the number of non-executive directorships held.
31. Letter, dated 28 October 1991, from Simon Jenkins, The Times
Letter sets out personal views on the role of non-executive directors.
32. Letter and submission from the Society of Investment Analysts, 29 October 1991
The submission covers the composition of the Board e.g. Separate Chairman and Chief Executive, non-executive directors; qualitative and quantitative financial reports, importance of non-executive directors, external auditors and audit committees.
33. Letter, dated 29 October 1991, from Ewan Macpherson, Smith & Williamson
Letter gives his view on roles and responsibilites of non-executive directors including remuneration committees.
34. Correspondence with and submission from Institute of Public Relations, December 1991
Main content is 'A submission to the Committee on the Finacinal Aspects of Corporate Governance by the Institute of Public Relations , City & Financial Group, December 1991.
Covers issues such as communication between boards and shareholders, emphasis on the long term, corporate reporting, company-auditor relationships, responsibilities of non-executive directors, audit committees and auditors responsibilities.
Includes a draft work programme and an update of the draft Accounting Practices Board discussion draft.
37. Corporate Governance Committee Correspondence 1992-1994.
Correspondence on subjects such as rights of executive directors to seek external professional advice and be re-imbursed, comments on comments on the draft report, the interests of of the 'private' shareholder as well as the interests of the institutional ones.
38. Record of meeting with Hugh Collum, 100 Group, 14 January 1992
Comments on the papers circulated for the 20-21 January 1992 meeting.
Covers some aspects of institutional investors and also their relations with non-executive directors in two articles.
40. Letter, dated 21 February 1992, from Dr Maurice Gillibrand and submission to the Committee.
Submission covers communication between boards and stakeholders, executive and non-executive directors, corporate reporting.
The views cover the range of auditing issues, non-executive directors, responsibilities of directors, divided boards and other matters.
Reports the results of a survey. Auditors are least likely to benefit while non-executive directors benefit most. Responsibility for compliance lies with company management and institutional shareholders or Stock Exchange, while expresses doubts over self-regulation.
43. Letter, dated 16 June 1992, from Stewart Douglas-Mann, Guinness Mahon & Co.
Comments on the wording re independence of non-executive directors.
Comments that fraud is very difficult to prevent and comments on non-executive directors and auditing, especially their resignation advice.
45. Letter, dated 18 June 1992, Annual Report analysis from Jonathan Chaytor and FT article.
Comments on institutional investors, non-executive directors and internal auditors.
46. Letter, dated 24 June 1992, from EA Bradman.
Comments on voluntary nature of the code, non-executive directors, the role of audit committees, directors' contracts and the independence of auditors.
47. Letter, 24 June 1997, from Edward Adeane, Hambros and reply by Nigel Peace.
Seeks and gives clarification on the meaning of independent in relation to non-executive directors.
This is a workshop exercise on the role of the directors in Eurotunnel delivered at the ICAEW conference . It is used to comment on unitary boards, separation of roles of Chairman and Chief Executive, non-executive directors and institutional investors.
49. Letter and comments, dated 30 June 1992, from Tim Knowles.
Comments on non-executive directors, financial reporting, auditing and institutional shareholders.
Hirst expresses concern about the suggestion that non-executive directors should only serve on one board.